Are there published rules I need to follow?
The public rules page showed no rules, and the moderator one-liner only asks that posts stay relevant to saving digital heritage and digital archiving.
A source-backed Rankhog guide to r/Archiveteam: public rules, community context, posting fit, and startup-promotion risk before you publish.
Checked November 1, 2026 from the community's public Reddit pages:
By Anthony Riera, founder and operator of Rankhog.
Subreddit guides combine public Reddit source URLs, captured rules, visible verification dates, and Rankhog's account-safety workflow.
No subreddit-specific rules were displayed on the public rules page when Rankhog verified it on 2026-11-01.
This community is for Archive Team, which its own description calls a loose collective of rogue archivists, programmers, writers and loudmouths dedicated to saving our digital heritage. The group has been active since 2009 and focuses on catching shutdowns, shutoffs, mergers, and plain old deletions, then saving the history before it is lost forever. The people who post here care about preservation of digital material, so the room is full of people who think about what disappears from the internet and how to keep copies of it. There are no published rules on the community's public rules page, but the moderator one-liner asks that posts stay relevant to saving digital heritage and digital archiving.
A good post here connects to the mission of saving digital heritage. If you are a founder, the honest move is to post something useful to archivists first, like a tool, a dataset, a preservation problem you ran into, or a question about how to keep data alive. If your product genuinely helps with archiving or preservation, say so plainly and tie it to that mission, because the moderator one-liner asks for relevance to saving digital heritage and digital archiving. Ask real questions, share what you learned, and let the community see you care about the same thing they do.
The stated risk here is simple. The moderator one-liner says to keep posts relevant to saving digital heritage and digital archiving, so anything off that topic is the thing to avoid. There are no published rules that name removal reasons or bans, so I will not invent any. What I can say from the evidence is that a post with no connection to archiving or preservation is the clearest way to miss the mark.
Want the version that does not run out? Subscribers get unlimited tool runs and more careful checks before posting.
Get my free Reddit SEO auditStart your 7-day free trial. Card required. $99/month after trial. Next, connect a verified Reddit account; no strategy starts until you explicitly start Rankhog.
A free AI moderator simulation that checks your draft against published subreddit rules and six Reddit-native removal risks before you post.
Look up any Reddit user's post karma, comment karma and account age, and see how many subreddit posting rules the account clears.
Look up a subreddit's members, weekly visitors, age, growth and the karma and account age it asks of new posters.
Find any Reddit account's cake day, its exact age, and when it becomes old enough for the subreddits it wants to post in.
Type a subreddit or a topic and I'll show you up to 12 subreddits from our guides. Each row has the member count, the karma and account age to post, and whether self-promo is allowed.
The public rules page showed no rules, and the moderator one-liner only asks that posts stay relevant to saving digital heritage and digital archiving.
The evidence does not say, so the safe read is that anything promotional should be clearly relevant to the archiving mission or held back.
The evidence does not state a link policy, so lead with substance and only link when it genuinely serves the archiving discussion.
The evidence does not address AI content, so there is no stated rule either way.
The description says the group catches wind of shutdowns, shutoffs, mergers, and deletions, so anything about saving at-risk digital material fits the room.